Weekly Case

Title : Case 450

Age / Sex : 22 / F



Chief complaint
Intermittent left posterior neck pain and left scapular pain



What is your impression? 

Two weeks later, you can see the final diagnosis with a brief discussion of this case. (Please submit only one answer)

Courtesy : Sun Ki Kim, Incheon St. Mary’s
Hospital, T
he Catholic University of Korea



Diagnosis:

Osteoblastoma



Discussion



Findings:



CT :



Spine CT of a 19-year-old male presenting an about 2.6 x 1.8 x 2 cm sized
expansile osteolytic bone tumor in left neural arch (pedicle and lamina) of T1,
with cortical thining and breakage, and central irregular calcification or
ossification.



And also noted sclerotic change to adjacent vertebral body of T1.



 



MRI :



Spine MRI demonstrating a multilobulated expansile bone tumor in left
neural arch (pedicle and lamina) of T1.



This lesion reveals intermediate SI with central low SI on T1WI, low SI on
T2WI and strong contrast enhancement on fat sat contrast-enhanced T1WI. 



There are surrounding soft tissue infiltration and bone marrow edema.



 



Differential Diagnosis:



1.  Osteoid osteoma



2.  Aneurysmal bone cyst



3.  Bone metastasis.



4.  Osteosarcoma.



5.  Chondrosarcoma



6.  Infection



 



Diagnosis: 



Osteoblastoma



 



Discussion:



Osteoblastoma –



I.       an uncommon osteoid tissue-forming primary
neoplasm of the bone.



II.      It has histologic manifestations similar to
those of osteoid osteoma.



III.     accounts for 1–3 % of all primary bone tumors,
with a male-female ratio of 2.5 : 1.



IV.    between 32% and 46% of osteoblastomas involve
the spine (mainly the posterior
elements).



V.     80-90 percent of osteoblastomas manifest in
the 2nd and 3rd decades of life.



 



Radiographic features



Conventional radiography and CT



I.       typically larger than 2 cm in size.



II.      predominantly lytic and expansile



III.     reactive sclerosis adjacent to the lesion



IV.    internal matrix mineralization



V.     cortical expansion, sometimes with cortical
destruction



VI.    surrounding sclerosis or periostitis in up to
50%



 



MRI



I.       T1WI : low / intermediate signal intensity,
with areas of decreased intensity that correspond to mineralization



II.      T2WI : intermediate / high signal intensity,
low signal areas of bone matrix, peritumoral edema may involve adjacent bones
and soft tissues



III.     T1WI with contrast enhancement : variable
enhancement
, peritumoral
edema may enhance  



 



Treatment and prognosis



I.       Curettage with bone grafting. Preoperative
embolization may be useful.



II.      Percutaneous ablation



III.     The recurrence rate is 10%–15%.



 



 



References:



1.     Ross, Brant -
Zawadzki, Moore, Crim, Chen, Katzman : Diagnostic Imaging SPINE, Amirsys,  IV:1-22 to IV:1-25



2.     Resnick, Kransdorf : Bone and
Joint Imaging, 3rd edition, Elsevier Saunders, 2005, 1126-1130



3.     Rodallec MH, Feydy A,
Larousserie F, Anract P, Campagna R, Babinet A, Zins M, Drapé JL. Diagnostic
imaging of solitary tumors of the spine: what to do and say. Radiographics.
2008;28(4):1019-41.



4.    Murphey MD, Andrews CL, Flemming DJ, Temple HT, Smith WS, Smirniotopoulos JG.


From the archives
of the AFIP. Primary tumors of the spine: radiologic pathologic



correlation.
Radiographics. 1996;16(5):1131-58.



Correct Answer
Name Institution
이름:소속병원
Total applicants:26
Correct answers:24
김동환:분당제생병원, 전공의
전성희:중앙보훈병원, 전공의
강건우:군의관, 전문의
이혜란:석병원, 전문의
양지연:오병원, 전문의
이승훈:한양대병원, 전문의
박상옥:안산21세기병원, 전문의
박지원:대구참튼튼병원, 전문의
이승현:세브란스병원, 전문의
김유진:인하대병원, 전공의
최수연:고대안암병원, 전공의
송윤아:한양대병원, 전문의
최희석:나사렛국제병원, 전문의
이지현:병무청, 전문의
김현수:병무청, 전문의
이지은:안산예스병원, 전문의
이은주:좋은아침병원, 전문의
하종수:안양샘병원, 전문의
김예림:죽전예스병원, 전문의
전선경:서울대병원, 전공의
최형인:서울대병원, 전공의
이승민:단국대병원, 전공의
김성관:수도병원, 전문의
김윤하:단국대병원, 전공의
Semi-correct answer:1
박주일:서울대병원, 전공의

Comment