Title : Case 580 |
---|
Age / Sex : 22 / M Chief complaint : Back pain DiscussionAnswer: Spinal osteoid osteoma
Findings: MRI: On T1- and T2WI, a small round shaped lesion at right superior articular process of L1 surrounded by bone marrow edema. Bone marrow edema is noted at right pericle, lamina, transverse process and superior articular process of L1 with adjacent soft tissue signal change. CT: nidus with reactive sclerosis at right pedicle and superior articular processs of L1 Discussion: Spinal osteiod osteoma usually affect the posterior elements. In the spine, the lumbar spine followed by the cervical and then the dorsal spine are most commonly affected. The patients are usually young and present with back pain. The classical clinical presentation of spinal osteoid osteoma is that of painful scoliosis. Other clinical features include nerve root irritation and night pain. Pain relief with aspirin is classical. However, the typical symptoms of osteoid osteoma are reported to occur only in one half to two thirds of patients. On MRI, an area of edema in the posterior and lateral aspect of a vertebral body with pedicle involvement is classically seen. The presence of extensive perinidal edema in osteoid osteoma is thought be due to high levels of cyclo-oxygenase–2 expression in neoplastic osteoblasts in the nidus. Gadolinium administration has been suggested to improve conspicuity and detection of the nidus. A CT is needed after the MRI to clearly identify the nidus with surrounding lucency. The sclerotic reaction can also be well assessed. Bone scintigraphy has been advocated to localise the vertebral level in young patients with clinically suspected osteoid osteoma. Bone scintigraphy is almost invariably positive. Differential diagnosis Stress fracture Intracortical abscess References: Harish S, Saifuddin A. Imaging features of spinal osteoid osteoma with emphasis on MRI findings. Eur Radiol. 2005;15 (12): 2396-403. Chai JW, Hong SH, Choi JY et-al. Radiologic diagnosis of osteoid osteoma: from simple to challenging findings. Radiographics. 2010;30 (3): 737-49.
|
Correct Answer | |||
---|---|---|---|
Total applicants | 45 | Correct answers | 36 |
Name | Institution | ||
송윤아 | 전문의 | ||
박병진 | 국군강릉병원, 전문의 | ||
한유비 | 전문의 | ||
김창현 | 전문의 | ||
김미선 | 전문의 | ||
조영민 | 전문의 | ||
서현주 | 전문의 | ||
조은경 | 새움병원, 전문의 | ||
박준동 | 뿌리병원, 전문의 | ||
이혜란 | 전문의 | ||
이광진 | 청주프라임 병원, 전문의 | ||
권소이 | 전문의 | ||
전성희 | 전문의 | ||
이혜란 | 전문의 | ||
이영선 | 전문의 | ||
석지현 | 전문의 | ||
손상욱 | 군의관, 전문의 | ||
강정현 | 전문의 | ||
김형민 | 전문의 | ||
노정현 | 전문의 | ||
고에스더 | 전문의 | ||
김동환 | 서울아산병원, 전문의 | ||
김태형 | 전문의 | ||
김현영 | 분당서울대학교병원, 전문의 | ||
여유진 | 전문의 | ||
조영민 | 전문의 | ||
김기욱 | 국군대전병원, 전문의 | ||
이은채 | 전문의 | ||
석지현 | 전문의 | ||
임재정 | 서울성모병원, 전문의 | ||
윤유성 | 삼성서울병원, 전문의 | ||
이은주 | 전문의 | ||
김희정 | 전문의 | ||
김보람 | 전문의 | ||
이지현 | 삼성서울병원, 전문의 | ||
장용석 | 고려대학교 구로병원, 전문의 |
Comment |
---|