Title : Case 534 |
---|
Age / Sex : 17 / M Chief complaint: Bulging contour with tenderness at right pretibial area What is your impression? Two weeks later, you can see the final diagnosis with a brief discussion of this case. (Please submit only one answer) Courtesy: Hye Won Chung, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center Diagnosis: Adamantinoma DiscussionFindings: Multilobulated, elongated shaped, eccentrically located, cortical based bone lesion with intramedullary extension along the right tibial diaphysis. Associated localized cortical breakthrough with extraosseous extension of the lesion. Satellite lesion at the lateral aspect of distal tibial metaphysis and medial aspect of distal fibular diaphysis and metaphysis
Osteofibrous dysplasia Diagnosis: Adamantinoma Discussion: Primary low-grade, malignant bone tumor Rare tumor (only 0.1-0.5% of all primary bone tumors) Median age: 25-35 years (2-86 years) Predominantly located in mid-portion of tibia and sometimes simultaneously in tibia and adjacent fibula or in fibula without tibial lesion Locally aggressive tumor and extremely slow growing with potential to metastasize.
[Radiologic findings] Central or eccentric, multilocular slightly expansile, sharply or poorly delineated ostelytic lesion. Diaphyseal location, may metaphyseal extension Well-circumscribed lesion involving anterior tibial cortex, with septations and peripheral sclerosis Soap-bubble appearance Commonly intra-cortical, may destroy cortex and invade extracortical soft tissues Difficult to distinguish from osteofibrous dysplasia, which located in cortex without involvement of medullary bone and without soft tissue involvement References: 1. Bethapudi S, Ritchie D.A., Macduff E, Straiton J. Imaging in osteofibrous dysplasia, osteofibrous dysplasia-like adamantinoma, and classic adamantinoma. Clin Radiology 2014;69: 200-208. 2. Van der Woude HJ, Hazelbag HM, Bloem JL, Taminiau AH, Hogendoorn PC. MRI of adamantinoma of long bones in correlation with histopathology. AJR 2004;183:1737-1744. |
Correct Answer | |||
---|---|---|---|
Total applicants | 31 | Correct answers | 21 |
Name | Institution | ||
박준동 | 뿌리병원, 전문의 | ||
이혜란 | 전문의 | ||
양지연 | 전문의 | ||
정소용 | 생생병원, 전문의 | ||
이동준 | 분당차병원, 전공의 | ||
김철영 | 이춘택병원, 전문의 | ||
김동환 | 군의관, 전문의 | ||
송윤아 | 한양대학교병원, 전문의 | ||
윤유성 | 구례병원, 전문의 | ||
노승연 | 전공의 | ||
Ho | 전공의 | ||
김보람 | 전공의 | ||
정유선 | 전문의 | ||
김완태 | 중앙보훈병원, 전문의 | ||
최희석 | 나사렛국제병원, 전문의 | ||
정미란 | 전공의 | ||
이지현 | 병무청, 전문의 | ||
신윤상 | 군의관, 전문의 | ||
김유진 | 전문의 | ||
안태란 | 서울의료원, 전공의 | ||
라요한 | 성균관대학교 삼성서울병원, 전문의 |
Comment |
---|