Title : Case 528 |
---|
Age / Sex : 62 / M Chief complaint: Palpable masses, sole, both What is your impression? Two weeks later, you can see the final diagnosis with a brief discussion of this case. (Please submit only one answer) Courtesy: Ji Young Hwang, Ewha Womans University, College of Medicine, Mokdong Hospital Diagnosis: Plantar fibromatosis DiscussionFindings: The mass of left sole is isointense to slightly hypointense relative skeletal muscle on axial T1WI (Fig.1), and heterogeneously hyperintense to skeletal muscle on axial T2WI (Fig.2). This mass is strongly enhanced on gadolinium enhanced T1WI (Fig.3). Sagittal MRIs of right foot show a nodular lesion involving plantar fascia, which have lower signal intensities on T1WI (Fig.4) and T2WI (Fig.5). The proximal and distal ends of the mass smoothly blends with the fascia, which is typical finding.
Xanthoma Epidermal cysts Synovial sarcoma
Plantar fibromatosis, bilateral Discussion: Plantar fibromasosis is infiltrative fibroblastic lesions most commonly found arising from plantar fascia or aponeurosis. Palmar and plantar fibromatosis belong to superficial fibromatosis. Medial location is most common and 20-50% of cases are bilateral. MRI and US are used for the diagnosis. Typical imaging finding is lentiform lesion that blends with plantar aponeurosis at proximal and distal ends, which is best seen on sagittal MRI and longitudinal US. The signal intensity of the mass is isointense to skeletal muscle on T1WI, slight hyperintense relative to skeletal muscle on T2WI, and significantly enhanced after gadolinium enhancement. Mature lesions are more likely to have low signal intensity on T2WI and less enhanced, which are less likely to recur locally after resection of the mass. Mature lesions are hypocellular and contains dense collagen. It can invade muscles or neurovascular bundles. On US, small mass tends to be hypoechoic, otherwise the mass may show mixed echogenicity. References: 1. Kransdorf MJ et al: Benign fibrous and fibrohistiocytic tumors. In Kransdorf MJ el al.: Imaging of soft tissue tumors. 2nd ed. Piladelphia: Lippincott William & Wilkins. 217-223, 2016 2. Catherine C. Robert: Fibroblastic and myoblastic tumors. In Manaster BJ et al.: Diagnostic Imaging Musculoskeletal: Non-traumatic disease. Canada: Amirsys. 3:72-73, 2010 |
Correct Answer | |||
---|---|---|---|
Total applicants | 34 | Correct answers | 28 |
Name | Institution | ||
문태용 | 양산부산대학교병원, 전문의 | ||
정소용 | 생생병원, 전문의 | ||
박준동 | 뿌리병원, 전문의 | ||
김동환 | 군의관, 전문의 | ||
김현진 | 전공의 | ||
홍지현 | 전문의 | ||
이광진 | 전문의 | ||
송윤아 | 한양대학교병원, 전문의 | ||
김기욱 | 강남세브란스병원, 전문의 | ||
이동준 | 분당차병원, 전공의 | ||
이지현 | 병무청, 전문의 | ||
양지연 | 전문의 | ||
박재일 | 대구 척탑병원, 전문의 | ||
이혜란 | 전문의 | ||
김태형 | 전문의 | ||
김완태 | 중앙보훈병원, 전문의 | ||
이연옥 | 전문의 | ||
황지선 | 전공의 | ||
여유진 | 전문의 | ||
박주일 | 전공의 | ||
신재환 | 군의관, 전문의 | ||
박선영 | 한림대학교 성심병원, 전문의 | ||
서현주 | 전문의 | ||
정유선 | 전문의 | ||
김보람 | 전공의 | ||
조신영 | 웰튼병원, 전문의 | ||
신윤상 | 군의관, 전문의 | ||
안태란 | 서울의료원, 전공의 |
Comment |
---|