Weekly Case

Title : Case 476

Age / Sex : 69 / M



Chief complaint : Painful thigh mass


What is your impression? 

Two weeks later, you can see the final diagnosis with a brief discussion of this case. (Please submit only one answer)


Courtesy: Cha Jang Gyu, Soonchunhyang
Bucheon hospital


Diagnosis:

Myositis ossificans



Discussion



Findings:



 Radiography : no abnormal density in soft
tissue and bony structure.



 MRI : There is a ill-defined, T2 high SI, T1
iso to slightly high SI soft tissue lesion with enhancement in the vastus
medialis muscle at the mid level of the thigh. Muscle fibers are relatively preserved
and it does not show adjacent soft tissue and bone marrow signal change.



 USG : About 6cm relatively well defined, oval
hyperechoic lesion with inner hypoechoic portion is noted in the vastus medialis
muscle. Probably it contains multiple microcalcifications and they are shown by
very echogenic portion of the lesion. On power doppler image, It shows little
vascular flow.



 



 



Differential Diagnosis:



 Proliferative myositis



 Lymphoma



 Sarcoidosis



 



Diagnosis:
 



 Myositis ossificans.



 



Discussion:



       Heterotrophic
ossification, formation of non-neoplastic bonelike tissue in any soft tissue
location including skeletal muscle, tendon, fascia, ligament, other connective
tissue.



      3 phases : early (< 1 week),
subacute (>10 day), late (maturation, 2-5 wks)



      Bony production : peripheral,
centripetal



       Etiology : unknown, may secondary to
trauma



       Clinical manifestation : very
inflammatory, rapidly growing, painful muscular mass, dramatic onset



       Imaging finding



[Radiolography]



      The earliest radiological signs appear within
7 to 14 days, describing a well-circumscribed soft-tissue mass associated with
a faint periosteal reaction



[USG]



      homogeneous or heterogeneous hypoechoic
mass



        



[CT]



      Gold standard in characterizing the
typical features, extensive muscle edema and perilesional edema without bone
marrow or cortical abnormalities.



 



[MRI]



      Lack of invasion of adjacent tissues
within lesion



      T1 and T2 : iso to slightly high SI



      
T2-weighted
images of early stage lesions, i.e., before peripheral ossification has
occurred, show an inhomogenous localized mass with high central signal
intensity. With time, the lesion matures and the peripheral ossification
becomes denser (visible on conventional radiograph). On T2-weighted MRI, the
classical finding of a hyperintense center surrounded by a hypointense rim can
be recognized.



      
On
T1-weighted images, the lesion appears isointense to muscle and can only be
identified by its mass effect. Specific STIR images on T1 make further
distinction possible by yielding the lesion slightly hyperintense to muscle and
by distinguishing it from the surrounding edema, which is a typical feature.



      Gd T1-CE : rim enhancement (zone
phenomenon : active hypervascularized osteoid matrix)



      Subacute : low SI on all sequences
mineralization



       Differential diagnosis



      At the early stage, it can be
distinguished from soft-tissue neoplasms by its extensive muscle edema without
bone marrow or cortical abnormalities. Other lesions presenting surrounding
edema are infection, rhabdomyolysis and hematoma. The differential diagnosis
with other slowly calcified lesions includes synovial sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma
and malignant fibrous histiocytoma. At the advanced stage, it must always be
distinguished from osteosarcoma or chondrosarcoma. Those entities present a
pattern of mineralization with peripheral mature ossification. However,
osteosarcomas usually have a dense, calcified center, while in myositis
ossificans the most calcified zone is at the periphery.



 



References:



Resnick
D. diseases of soft tissue and muscle. In: Resnick D, Kransdorf MJ, eds. Bone
and joint imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2005; 1386-1387



Saussez
S1, Blaivie C, Lemort M, Chantrain G. Non-traumatic myositis ossificans in the
paraspinal muscles. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Apr;263(4):331-5. Epub 2005
Aug 24.



Lacout
A, Jarraya M, Marcy PY, et al. Myositis ossificans imaging: keys to successful
diagnosis. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012;22(1):35-39



Vanden
Bossche L, Vanderstraeten G. Heterotopic ossification: a review. J Rehabil Med
2005;37(3):129-136



 



Correct Answer
Name Institution
Total applicant:32
Correct answers:22
김동환:군의관, 전문의
박준동:뿌리병원, 전문의
한유비:가톨릭대학교 인천성모병원, 전공의
조신영:웰튼병원, 전문의
김환용:벌교삼호병원, 전문의
박지원:대구참튼튼병원, 전문의
이혜란:석병원, 전문의
장동률:군복무, 전문의
김동현:서울대병원, 전문의
강건우:군의관, 전문의
전성희:중앙보훈병원, 전공의
김지민:순천향대 천안병원, 전공의
송윤아:한양대학교병원, 전문의
이하연:청주 최병원, 전문의
박지원:대구참튼튼병원, 전문의
황성태:고대안암, 전공의
박선영:한림대병원, 전문의
김지현:하이병원, 전문의
박주일:서울대학교병원, 전공의
이지현:병무청, 전문의
하종수:샘병원, 전문의
최희석:나사렛국제병원, 전문의

Comment