Age / Sex : 34 / F
34/F
C.C.: Left shoulder pain and palpable mass for about 6 months(growing tendency) (Click to enlarge)
1) What is your impression? A first impression and three or less differential diagnoses are acceptable.
Courtesy : Jin Gyoon Park, MD Chonnam National University College of Medicine Diagnosis: Bizarre pariosteal osteochondromatous proliferation(BPOP) or Nora's lesion(proxiaml humerus)
Discussion
Findings: 1) Plain radiography - lobulated bony mass at the lateral aspect of proximal metaphysis of the left humerus 2) CT - parosteal ossified mass contiguous with adjacent humeral cortex. - intact cortex of underlying bone. - no continuity with medullary cavity. 3) MRI - parosteal ossified mass covered with cartilage cap. - peripheral and partial Gd-enhancement. - well demarcation from overlying soft tissue. - no involvement of adjacent humeral bone marrow
Differential Diagnosis: - Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP) or Nora's lesion - osteochondroma - parosteal osteosarcoma - myositis ossificans - heterotopic chondro-ossification - florid reactive periostitis - subungual exostosis - turret exostosis - streess fracture with extensive callous formation
Diagnosis: Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP) or Nora's lesion
Discussion: - rare, benign lesion that was first described by Nora et al. in 1983 in the hands or feet of young adults. - short tubular bone involvement > long bone. - Minor trauma is an etiologic factor in the development of BPOP. - Antecedent trauma is reported in the patient's history from 0% to 50% of cases. - Myositis ossificans and florid reactive periostitis may progress to BPOP. - high recurrence rate after surgical resection, up to 55% of cases * Radiographic findings - dense, non-homogeneous and often multilobulated mass with a broad base attached to the bone cortex. - heavy mineralization with sclerotic appearance. - occasionaly, rapid growth and aggressive features on imaging studies. - no cortical or permeative bone destruction. - no continuity between mass and medullary cavity of underlying bone. - positive scintigraphy with an intense tracer uptake in the lesion. * MRI features - useful in differentiating BPOP from several of its mimickers. - low signal on T1WI, high signal on STIR imaging. - variable signal on FSE T2 and GRE sequences, probably related to the relative amounts of cartilage present within the lesion.
References: 1. Ryu KN, Park YK, Han CS. Radiological Findings of Bizarre Parosteal Osteochondromatous Proliferation. Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1999;41(3):571-575. 2. Shin BK, Cho HD, Yum BW, et al. Bizarre Parosteal Osteochondromatous Proliferation of the Femur (Nora’'s Lesion). J. of Korean Bone & Joint Tumor Soc 1999;5(3):178-182. 3. Ly JQ, Bui-Mansfieldb LT, Taylor DC. Radiologic demonstration of temporal development of bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation. Journal of Clinical Imaging 2004;28:216–218. 4. Sundaram M, Wang L, Rothman M, et al: Florid reactive periostitis and bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation: Pre-biopsy imaging evolution, treatment and outcome. Skeletal Radiol 2001;30:192-198. 5. Torreggiani WC, Munk PL, Al-Ismail K, et al. MR imaging features of bizzarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of bone (Nora’'s lesion). Eur J Radiol 2001;40:224–231.
|