Weekly Case

Title : Case 705

Age / Sex : 22 / F


Chief complaint: Lower back pain with pain & tingling sensation of both legs for 2 years


What is your diagnosis?


Two weeks later, you can see the final diagonosis with a brief discussion of this case (Please submit only one answer).


Courtesy: 강병성 (Byeong Seong Kang, M.D.), 울산대학교병원 (Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea)


Diagnosis:

Myxopapillary ependymoma



Discussion


Findings:


MR: A midline intradural extramedullary mass at L3 level


- Axial and sagittal T2-WI: heterogeneous hyperintensity


- Sagittal T1-WI: isosignal intensity relative to spinal cord


- Axial and sagittal fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-WI: intense and heterogeneous enhancement


 


Differential Diagnosis: Myxopapillary ependymoma / Neurogenic tumor


 


Diagnosis: Myxopapillary ependymoma


 


Discussion:


Myxopapillary ependymomas tend to have an earlier clinical presentation (mean age, 35 years) and are more commonly seen in male patients. They have a distinct predilection for the conus medullaris or filum terminale and are thought to arise from the ependymal glia of the filum terminale. These tumors have a nonspecific radiologic appearance and are typically isointense relative to the spinal cord on T1-weighted MR images and hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images. Hyperintensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images may be noted occasionally, a finding that reflects mucin content or hemorrhage. Enhancement is virtually always seen after the intravenous administration of contrast material. The predilection of these tumors for the conus medullaris should be suggestive of the diagnosis.


 


References



  1. Koeller KK, Rosenblum RS, Morrison AL. Neoplasms of the spinal cord and filum terminale: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2000;20:1721-49.

  2. Koeller KK, Shih RY. Intradural extramedullary spinal neoplasms: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2019;39:468-90.



Correct Answer
Total applicants 26 Correct answers 20
Name Institution
김기욱 전문의
윤유성 순천향대 부천병원, 전문의
현혜란 인천사랑병원, 전문의
박영태 충북대학교병원, 전공의
이진영 전문의
이규정 국군대전병원, 전문의
전인환 전문의
최형인 군의관, 전문의
여현정 전문의
박준동 마이크로병원, 전문의
이혜란 전문의
최은지 전공의
한진우 고려대학교 구로병원, 전문의
김동언 서울아산병원, 전문의
이승보 서울아산병원, 전문의
백승진 분당차병원, 전공의
김성진 365병원, 전문의
김형민 연세의대 강남세브란스병원, 전문의
윤나연 전공의
권기언 서울아산병원, 전문의
Semi-Correct Answer
Total applicants 26 Semi-Correct answers 4
송윤아 전문의
김현진 서울성모병원, 전공의
김동현 단국대학교병원, 전공의
임윤진 단국대학교병원, 전공의


Comment